Links



Video: Santorum, Romney, Gingrich speak at CPAC 2012

Rick Santorum, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich all spoke at the 2012 CPAC conference on Friday, February 10. Here are the full videos of their remarks in the order they were delivered.

Santorum:

Romney:

Gingrich:

Ron Paul was invited to be the keynote speaker at CPAC 2012 but declined the invitation in favor on campaigning.


Auto-Generated Tags:

3 comments to Video: Santorum, Romney, Gingrich speak at CPAC 2012

  • Surfisher

    Bama's worst nightmare would be debating Ron Paul (without a tele-prompter Bama can hardly put two coherent statements together, let alone an unscripted hour+ debate)!

    Ron Paul's Constitutional knowledge, accurate historical data, superior by ten fold intellect, and good nature as a genuine caring person — even though not an orator (RP) — will by SUBSTANCE destroy the small-minded narcissistic Bama's empty Rhetoric and the Bankrupt Socialist Dogma he spews in ANGER when "displeased"!

    Bama had some worries in debating Newt (the two can out-lie each other, on any given occasion). But now that Newt is nearly done — Bama is happy.

    Bama is on top of the world NOW — since his reelection is about to be GUARANTEED by the GOP's choice to do whatever it takes (legal or illegal) for tepid Mitt to challenge him (Romney-Money is what the out-of-touch GOP hopes may counter Bama's billion dollars campaign)!

    This will be the best outcome for Bama — to face flip-flopping Romney (since Bama can make Mitt turn any way he wants…after all Mitt stands for everything (and nothing)…depending on the audience)! Bama's writers have already scripted what Bama needs to remember, so he can rip Mitt apart on Bain Capital and Cayman Islands accounts!

    Prediction: Bama wins by virtue of GOP's idiocy!

  • Janet

    It seems that you have ALL THE ANSWERS. Newt is not finished yet. If the words and attitudes of Ron Paul supporters are all so aggressive, full of name calling and no real facts…who is the best to out-lie whom? Ron Paul has some very good ideas and is a very intellegent man, however, his veiw for America is to narrow. The type of supporters like yourself Nate, whom just spew out negative garbage with no real facts only harm the process.

    Newt has the experience we need badly right now in America. Ron Paul himself says he knows he will not be president, that he wants to get his message out…and he has been doing that for years. Now he is teaming up with Mitt to take out Newt. I am very disappointed in Ron Paul.

  • Surfisher

    It is estimated that nearly 500,000,000 as of 2010 — about 1/2 billion — NEGATIVE Laws are on the books, meaning: "You, the US Citizen, cannot do 1/2 billion things, because we, the Government, have deemed such actions to be contrary to your well-being."

    In other words: "If you don't do what we think is for YOUR OWN GOOD, we have approved 1/2 billion ways to punish you!"

    More Laws (about 500,000,000) telling individuals what NOT to DO, than the total count of all the US Citizens alive (about 312,000,000)!

    The Arrogance of Office is best displayed by this pernicious Sophism: "Ignorance of the Law is no excuse".

    No sane person can expect an individual to memorize all the names of the 312 million US Citizens — but same individual is expected to know the EXACTITUDE of ALL 1/2 billion LAWS (or be penalized for the IGNORANCE)?!

    Only Ron Paul has questioned this EVER increasing "Law" passing — the rest are mute (seems they lack the education to comprehend the truth the Great Roman Statesman Cicero stated: 'The MORE Laws in a Nation, the LESS Justice for the Citizens' — nearly 2000 years later, Cicero's warning rings true: *More Laws = Less Liberty*)!

    No wonder the main media is doing their best to black-out Ron Paul — Truth is Bane for Big Brother wannabees.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>